The Rs 95,000-crore cost of closure needs to be reworked as all staff need not be given VRS; some can be redeployed.


Strategic disinvestment of BSNL or MTNL has been ruled out as there 
would not be any takers for it considering the current financial stress 
in the telecom industry.
After shooting down the proposal of the department of telecommunications
 (DoT) to pump in a massive Rs 74,000 crore to revive the ailing BSNL 
and MTNL, the finance ministry has suggested that both the sick PSUs be 
closed down.
Sources said in the event of closure of the two PSUs, the cost won’t be 
as high as Rs 95,000 crore as argued by the DoT while making a case for a
 Rs 74,000-crore revival package. The Rs 95,000-crore cost was coming in
 the case of providing an attra-ctive voluntary retirement sche-me to 
all 1.65 lakh BSNL empl-oyees and its debt repayment.
However, in the event of closure an attractive VRS need not be given to 
all the staff of the two PSUs. Actually, there re three kinds of staff 
employed in the two PSUs: 1) Those directly recruited by the firms. 2) 
Those who came from other PSUs or government departments and got 
themselves absorbed in these firms, and 3) The Indian Telecommunications
 Service (ITS) officers.

Now, in the case of closure, the ITS officers need not be given VRS but 
can be redeployed to other government departments. Those who are direct 
recruits are very junior staff, mostly technicians whose salary is not 
very high and whose strength is less than 10% of the overall staff. It 
is the absorbed staff which needs to be compulsorily retired by giving 
some form of VRS, which would entail some cost.
If the cost of closure is calculated on the basis of segregating the 
staff in these three broad categories, then it would be much less than 
Rs 95,000 crore. Sources said that the companies have been asked to 
identify the staff strength on these lines and then provide numbers so 
that actual cost of closure can be worked out.
Strategic disinvestment of BSNL or MTNL has been ruled out as there 
would not be any takers for it considering the current financial stress 
in the telecom industry.
The assumption behind the revival package, which involved an attractive 
VRS package to BSNL’s 1.65 lakh employees, reducing their retirement age
 from the current 60 years to 58 years, was that it would reduce the 
wage bill of the company which in FY19 was 77% of its revenues. Further,
 if the company was provided 4G spectrum by the government as part of 
the package then it would be able to compete in the market and start 
posting lower losses FY21 onwards and become profitable from FY24 
onwards.
The components of the revival package drawn up by the DoT was as 
follows: The VRS payout would entail a cost of Rs 29,182 crore, another 
Rs 10,993 crore would be the cost in terms of payout of retiral benefits
 by advancing the retirement age from 60 to 58 years. The allotment of 
4G spectrum would cost Rs 20,410 crore and another Rs 13,202 crore would
 be the capex required to roll out the 4G services.
The optimistic projection underlying the revival blueprint was that 
BSNL, which posted a net loss of Rs 13,804 crore in FY19, would see it 
widen to Rs 18,231 crore in FY20 but thereon it would start narrowing 
and come down to a loss of Rs 5,432 crore in FY21. It would post a net 
loss of Rs 396 crore in FY23 and then break into a profit of Rs 2,235 
crore in FY24.
Source : https://www.financialexpress.com/
