Monday, June 18, 2018

Why Maximum GDS Arrears Is Less Then Others

GDS Pay Committee Report Approved by Cabinet on 06th June 2018. According to Cabinet approval, there is no changes has made on TRCA, Increment, DA, Bonus and Arrears. After reviewing the maximum number of article, post, you tube video it is confirmed that the low paid GDS arrears will be lower than high paying GDS. But, the question is Why Maximum GDS Arrears is Less then Others GDS?

As per GDS Pay Committee,11 (Eleven) old TRCA merge by three new TRCA Slab and this TRCA Slab was on base of Time of office work which was 3 hours, 3 hours 30 minute, 4 hours, 4 hours 30
minute and 5 hours. Check the table below
Hours / Level 2 will be Rs. 14,500/-. Likewise, Dak Sevaks in Level 2 gets Rs. 12,000 as TRCA for 5 hours
See the above table, 3 hrs to 4 hrs GDS will be converted 4 hrs and there Level will be Level-1 and 4
hrs 30 mts & 5 hours GDS will be converted 5 working hours GDS and there Level will be Level 2. As GDS Salary has been increase on their working hours, So, their Arrears will calculated by their respective working hours by the GDS Pay Committee 2016.


Gramin Dak Sevak Pay Committee provide two formula to calculate GDS Arrears. Check the formula below

Illustration 1 :- Consider one GDS BPM prior to fixation in new wages scales is working in 3 hours TRCA Slab. GDS BPM will be fixed 4 in hours after fixation on New wages Scale once the recommendation of the committee are approved. He will be paid wages for 4 hours in the new scale on implementation of the recommendation of the report which would be any date prospectively after submission of report. Therefore for the period between 01.01.2016 and the date of implementation of the recommendation of the report, the GDS BPM will be paid arrears according
3 hours TRCA.

Illustration 2 :- Consider one GDS BPM prior to fixation in new wages scales is working in 3 hours TRCA Slab from 01.01.2016 to 31.05.2016 and then in 3.30 hours TRCA Slab from 01.06.2016 to the date of implementation of the recommendation of the report. In this case he/she will be paid arrears according to 3 hours TRCA Slab from 01.01.2016 to 31.05.2016 and then arrears according to 3 hours 30 minutes from 01.06.2016 till the implementation of report before he/she fixed in new wages slab of 4 hours.

Based on above Illustration, committee has prepared 11 arrears table for each existing slab the details are given on the Table.Read Recommended Arrears Table 
Click Here.

Example 1:- If you are getting 5 hours TRCA, for example your TRCA Slab was 4575-85-7125 on
01.01.2016 and your Basic pay was as below

4575-85-7125
Basic :-4,575.00
DA@125%:-5,119.00
Total :-10,294.00
Your New TRCA will be 14,500/- on 01.01.2016, So, your monthly arrears will be (14,500- 10,294)=4,206/- hence you are getting 5 hours maximum TRCA.

Example 2:-
If you are getting 3 hours TRCA, for example your TRCA Slab was 
2745-50-4245 on or before
01.01.2016 and your Basic pay was as below

2745-50-4245
Basic :-2,745.00

DA@125%:-3,431.00
Total :-6,176.00

Your New TRCA will be 12,000/- on 01.01.2016,hence you are getting 3 hours TRCA So, your arrears calculation will be as under
Your 4 Hours Pay 12,000/-Your 1 Hours Pay 12,000/4=3,000/-Your 3 Hours Pay 3,000*3=9,000/-
Deference between New 3 hours TRCA and 3 Old TRCA (9,000-6,176)=2,824/- Your Monthly Arrears will be 2,824/-

Note : If I say in one word, Divide your New TRCA with your new working hours then multiply it with your old working hours and minus it with the TRCA (basic + 125% DA) of 01.01.2016.For this reason the maximum number of GDS will be paid less arrears then others GDS who are getting 4.30 hrs and 5 hrs TRCA. 
S

Request for the considering the efficacy of upgrading of benchmark from' good' to' very good' for grant of MACP from the reporting year of 2016

-- 17


Request for the considering the efficacy of upgrading of benchmark from'  good' to'  very good' for grant of MACP from the reporting year of 2016 -- 17 

Many of officials have been denied MACP for want of upgraded very good benchmark even for the reporting year prior to the cut off year 16- 17 (25.7.16)  on the plea and 
taking it, otherwise, that the DPC fallen due after 25.7.16 should consider only very good benchmarking.

 Thus the conduct of DPC is construed as deciding factor of wanting in for 5 years benchmark rather than the reporting years prior and after the cut off date.

The DPCs elsewhere have taken the quantitative difference of APAR as such with reference to 25.7.16 instead mandating the upgraded benchmark even for the reporting years in which benchmark ' good' is contemplated optimum for the positive result in DSC.

A similar situation prevailed in 2008- 09, when numerical grading with benchmark was introduced replacing the 'average ' In order to render natural justice to those affected by changes in grading, an opportunity was given to them all for a fresh appeal to enhance the upgrading and thus the ill effect of 'average' in any of  years during the zone of consideration was dispelled. 


In the absence of any such reconciliation measure to remedy the under grading in the present instance, it is requested that the insistence of very good may kindly be insisted from the reporting year 16-17 onwards.

RESERVATION FOR CANDIDATES FROM OTHER BACKWARD CLASSES - REVISION OF INCOME CRITERIA AND DETERMINING EQUIVALENCE OF POSTS IN CENTRAL PUBLIC SECTOR ENTERPRISES (CPSES), PUBLIC SECTOR BANKS, PUBLIC FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, ETC. WITH POSTS IN GOVERNMENT FOR ESTABLISHING CREAMY LAYER CRITERIA – REGARDING


F. No. 36033/2/2018-Estt.(Res.)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions
Department of Personnel and Training
Establishment (Reservation-I) Section

  North Block, New Delhi Dated June 8, 2018
To
            The Chief Secretaries of all States / Union Territories

Subject:- Reservation for candidates from Other Backward Classes - Revision of Income Criteria and determining equivalence of posts in Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs), Public Sector Banks, Public Financial Institutions, etc. with Posts in Government for establishing Creamy Layer criteria – regarding

Madam/ Sir,
            I am directed to invite attention to this Department’s Office Memorandum No. 36012/22/93-Estt,(SCT) dated 08.09.1993 which, inter-alia provided that sons and daughters of persons having gross annual income of Rs.1 lakh or above for a period of three consecutive years would fall within the ‘creamy layer’ and would not be entitled to get the benefit of reservation available to the Other Backward Classes.

2.         The aforesaid limit of income for determining the creamy layer status was subsequently raised to Rs. 2.5 lakh, Rs. 4.5 lakh Rs. 6 lakh and Rs. 8 lakh vide this Department’s O.M. No. 36033/3/2004-Estt.(Res.) dated 09.03.2004, O.M. No.36033/3/2004-Estt. (Res) dated 14.10.2008, O.M. No. 36033/1/2013-Estt.(Res.) dated 27.05.2013 and CM. No. 36033/1/2013-Estt. (Res) dated 13.09.2017, respectively.

3.         This Department is in receipt of references seeking clarification on the status of equivalence and revision of income criteria, in Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs) and Financial Institutions with posts in Government. In this regard, copies of the following Office Memorandums issued by Department of Public Enterprises, Department of Financial Services and this Department are enclosed for ready reference:

i) O.M. No. 36033/1/2013-Estt.(Res.) dated 13.09.2017 of this Department regarding revision of income criteria;

ii) O.M. No. DPE-GM-/0020/2014-GM-FTS-1740 dated 25.10.2017 of the Department of Public Enterprises on establishing equivalence of posts in Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs) with Posts in Government for establishing Creamy Layer criteria; and

iii) O.M. No. 19/4/2017-Welfare dated 06.12.2017 of the Department of Financial Services on establishing equivalence of posts in respect of Public Sector Banks, Public Financial Institutions, Public Sector Insurance Companies.

4. It is requested to please bring the contents of the above mentioned O.M.s/ instructions to the notice of all concerned for information / compliance.
Yours faithfully,
Sd/-
(Raju Saraswat)
Under Secretary to the Government of India
Telefax - 23092110

Copy to:
1. All the Ministries/Departments of the Government of India
2. Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi
3. Department of Public Enterprises, CGO Complex, Lodi Road, New Delhi.
4. Department of Financial Services, Jeevan Deep Building, Parliament Street, New Delhi
5. National Commission for Backward Classes, Trikoot-1, Bhikaji Cama Place, R. K. Puram, New Delhi
6. Hindi Section for providing a translation
7. Guard File

Reservation in Promotion case status after Supreme Court interim Order - DOPT Order


F. No. 36012/11/2016- Estt.(Res-I) {Pt-II}
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions
Department of Personnel & Training
Establishment (Reservation-I) Section
North Block, New Delhi
Dated June 15, 2018
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Subject: Implementation of interim Orders/ directions in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 30621/2011 arising out of final judgment and order dated 15.07.2011 in CWP No. 13218/2009 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Punjab & Haryana and Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 31288/2017 arising out of Hon’ble Delhi High Court judgment dated 23.08.2017 and other related court cases — regarding
The Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its order dated 15.11.2017 in SLP(C) No. 28306/2017 has decided to refer to a Constitution Bench to examine whether its earlier decision in M. Nagraj and others vs. Union of India and others requires reconsideration or not, inter alia, on the issue as to whether test of backwardness would, at all, apply in case of SC and ST.
2. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP (C) No. 30621/2011 has passed the following Order on 17.05.2018:
“It is directed that the pendency of this Special Leave Petition shall not stand in the way of Union of India taking steps for the purpose of promotion from `reserved to reserved’ and ‘unreserved to unreserved’ and also in the matter of promotion on merits
3. Further, in the matter related to SLP(C) No. 31288/2017, connected to Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 28306/ 2017,  the Hon’ble Supreme Court held as under on 05.06.2018:
“Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned ASG has referred to order dated 17.05.2018 in SLP (C) No.30621/ 2011. It is made clear that the Union of India is not debarred from making promotions in accordance with law, subject to further orders, pending further consideration of the matter. Tag to SLP(C) No.30621 of 2011.”
4. The cadre controlling authorities of Central Government Ministries, Departments and Union Territories are to carry out promotions in accordance with the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court mentioned in paragraphs 2 and 3 above based on existing seniority/select lists.
5. Every promotion order must clearly mention the stipulation that the promotion shall be subject to further orders which may be passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
6. All Ministries/ Departments are requested to bring this to the notice of all concerned for information/ compliance.
7. State Governments are also advised to take necessary action in accordance with the above mentioned orders passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
(G. Srinivasan)
Deputy Secretary to the Government of India
View the Order Copy

Reservation in Promotion : No ban, carry out promotions in accordance with the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court based on existing seniority/select lists - DoP&T F. No. 36012/11/2016-Estt.(Res-I) {Pt-II}

Procurement of Generic Medicines under CGHS

 Read more

Friday, June 15, 2018

SHRI T.N. Rahate,General Secretay, piv going to abroad.

This is to inform to all concerned that Shri   T N Rahate, President FNPO and GS NUPE-IV is elected as delegate to participates in 
the 5th World Congress of UNI Global Unions{Union Network International GLOBAL UNION) from 17/6/2018 to 21//6/2018 at LIVERPOOL. UNITED KINGDOM
All wings of FNPO Congratulate Shri TN Rahate for this auspicious occasion. 
Wish him warm Greetings on this memorable opportunity.
BORN VOYAGE 

Redeployment of DPS posts in NE Circle

Promotion and postings in Postal Service Group 'B' cadre

EID MUBARACK