OUR APPEAL AGAINST THE REPLY OF THE DIRECTOR (MM) ON MNOP...

TO

THE CGM (MB)

Sub : Appeal against the reply of the Director (Mail Management).

Ref : Directorate letter No. 31-03/2009-D dated Nil Aug. 2011.

My Federation sought information under RTI Act on the project of MNOP and Speed Post restructuring.The reply given by the Director (Mail Management) is not satisfactory. Many of the queries were not answered directly. Therefore this is an appeal from our Federation to get proper reply from the Department.

Point 1 : Whether Mail Network Optimization Project discussed with Postal Board Members, if so a copy of the Board Meeting minutes may kindly be supplied.
The reply of the Director (MM) is not satisfactory. We want to know whether MNOP has been placed in the Postal Services Board or not.

Point 2 : Whether MNOP discussed with Heads of Circles, if so what is their opinion, opinion of each Circle may be supplied.
My Federation desires to know opinion of the each Heads of Circle. This was not available in the enclosed minutes.

Point 3 : Whether MNOP discussed with Minister of Communication and with Standing Committee members, a copy of their opinion may be supplied.
According to the reply from Director (MM), the Honourable Minister of Communication has not approved the project so far. Such being the condition, how the Department implemented a part of the Project without approval of the Minister.

Point 4 : Whether re-structuring of Speed Post processing centre project was discussed with the Postal Board members. If so a copy of the Board Meeting minutes may be supplied.
The reply from Director (MM), is not satisfied we want to know whether this project was discussed with the Members of the Postal Services Board or not.

Point 5 : Whether re-structuring of Speed Post processing centre project was discussed with the Heads of Circles, if so what is their opinion, opinion of each circle may be supplied.
The reply given by the Director (MM) is not satisfactory. We want opinion of the each circle Head. The Federation feels that reply given as opinion of the each Circle Head is not available with the Department is not agreeable. The opinion of the each Circle Head may be communicated to us.

Point 6 : What is the operational cost of each Speed Post article before re-structuring and what is the present operational cost of Speed Post article. Details may be supplied.
Without working out the cost of re-structuring, implementing the project is not fair. Transferring the point to other sections for reply is also not fair. We desire direct reply.

Point 7 : Total number of mail offices in the country as on date.

Point 8 : After re-structuring how many mail offices will be closed, the name of the mail offices may be supplied.

Point 9 : What is the present statistic of L1 & L2 offices?
The reply of the Director (MM) is satisfactory for Point No.7, 8 & 9.

Point 10 : Supply details of profile in L1 & L2 offices.
The Director (MM) did not meet our point in his reply. We desire to know mail profile of L-1 and L-2 throughout the country. For example, in Kolkata RMS on the receipt side the number of articles received from neighbouring circles, intra-circle and other circles. Like-wise the figures of despatch side also is required.

Point 11 : What is the operational cost of 1st class mail and Registered mail at present? What will be the future operational cost of the same?
Without working out the cost, proposal to implement the project is not fair.

Point 12 : Out of 89 Speeed Post Processing Centres, how many are under the control of SSP/SP and how many centres are headed by SSRM/SRM, furnish details.

Point 13 : Furnish the details the number of out-sourcing official/number of companies working in Speed Post Processing Centres, such as in Chennai, Mumbai & Bangalore.

Point 14 : Furnish the details
The reply of the Director (MM) Satisfactory for Point No. 12, 13 & 14.
My Federation requests reply from CGM (Mail Business) as early as possible.
DATING RECORDS OF TRADE UNION MEMBERSHIP .
MODERNISATION OF DEPARTMENT OF POSTS.
LATEST CENSUSES OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
CLICK HERE TO SEE THE DETAILS OF THE ABOVE