F. No. 11013/ 1/2016-Estt.A-III
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions
Department of Personnel & Training
(Establishment A-III Desk)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions
Department of Personnel & Training
(Establishment A-III Desk)
North Block, New Delhi – 110001
Dated: 5th August,2019
Dated: 5th August,2019
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Subject: Sanction for holding an elective office under Rule 15(1)(c) of CCS(Conduct) Rules, 1964 reg.
The undersigned is directed to say that
as per Rule 15 (1) (c) of the CCS (Conduct) Rules, 1964, no Government
servant shall except with the previous sanction of the Government, hold
an elective office, or canvass for a candidate or candidates for an
elective office, in any body, whether incorporated or not. DoPT’s O.M.
No. 11013/9/93-Estt.(A) dated 22.04.1994 had also stipulated that no
Government servant should be allowed to hold elective office in any
sports association/ federation for a term of more than 4 years, or for
one term whichever is less. Further, according to Department of Personnel & Training’s OM No. 11013/ ll /2007-Estt (A) dated the 13th November, 2007, [Click to Read this Order ]
the entire time of the Government servant should be available to the
Government and that no activities unconnected with his or her official
duties should be allowed to interfere with the efficient discharge of
such duties. All Ministries were requested to ensure that the
participation of the Government servants in the activities of the
cooperative societies conform to the above provisions and does not
interfere with the discharge of their official duties.
Instances have come to notice where
Government servants continue to hold elective offices in various
capacities for unduly long periods. In some cases, where bye-laws of
these bodies place restrictions on the number of consecutive terms a
person may hold an office, Government servants are reported to have
either got themselves re-elected after a gap or have got a family
member/ close relative elected as a surrogate in order to keep control
of such bodies. In such cases, Government servants may not be bestowing
adequate attention upon their official duties and, as a result, an
apprehension may arise that such Government servants also develop vested
interests, particularly if the body is involved in commercial
activities, directly or indirectly.
The policy on fixing an upper limit of
the number of years for which Government servants can hold elective
office in any body in their entire career has been reviewed and it has
been decided that a Government
servant may be allowed to hold elective office in any body, whether
incorporated or not, for period of two terms or for a period of 4 Years. whichever
is earlier, for which prior sanction would be required when a
Government servant contests an election in such body, as per existing
rules.
It is, therefore, necessary for the
Competent Authority to keep in mind all the relevant factors while
granting permission under Rule 15(1)(c) of CCS(Conduct) Rules, 1964. It
may also be necessary that cases of such sanctions are reviewed from
time to time and permissions earlier granted revoked where Government
servants have been holding office in any body, whether incorporated or
not, for more than four years or in cases there are charges of
corruption, adverse audit paras etc. In such cases, the Government
servant concerned may be directed to resign from his office in such body
immediately. He will cease to discharge any function from the date such
direction is conveyed to him, irrespective of the fact whether his
resignation from the body is accepted or not. This action may be taken
immediately in those cases where information is already available with
the Ministries and Departments. In addition, all the Ministries and
Departments are also requested to obtain information from their
employees in the proforma attached to this Office Memorandum for
reviewing the position as well as while considering the request for sanction under Rule 15(1)(c) of CCS(Conduct) Rules, 1964 in future.[ See Clarifications in Rule 15 ]
This O.M. issues in supersession of DoPT’s 11013/9/93-Estt.(A) dated 22.04.1994.
In so far as the employees of Indian
Audit and Accounts Departments are concerned, this O.M. issues after
consultation with Comptroller & Auditor General of India.
All Ministries/Departments/Offices are
requested to bring the above instructions to the notice of all
administrative authorities under their control.
(Satish Kumar)
Under Secretary to the Govt. of India
Under Secretary to the Govt. of India
Share this article :