|
Granting of Grade Pay hierarchy to UDC to the next promotional
post of Assistants - Ministerial Staff Association
Granting of Grade Pay hierarchy to UDC to the next promotional
post of Assistants - Ministerial Staff Association...
Secretary General of Ministerial Staff Association writes a detailed letter to the Secretary of Department of Science and Technology regarding the discrepancies in implementation of MACP Scheme to the ministerial staff working in the department of Survey of India.
Particularly the Upper Divisional Clerk (UDC) may be granted
4200 Grade Pay under the MACP Scheme to next promotional post of Assistant…
The detailed letter has been uploaded in the official blog of
Ministerial Staff Association, for your ready reference we have reproduced
and given below…
GRANT OF THE BENEFITS UNDER MACP TO UPPER DIVISION CLERK (UDC)
AND OTHER MINISTERIAL STAFF OF SURVEY OF INDIA IN THE HIERARCHY OF THE
PROMOTIONAL GRADE – REQUEST FOR.
MINISTERIAL STAFF ASSOCIATION
SURVEY OF INDIA, CENTRAL HEADQUARTERS : DEHRADUN
C/o NPG, Hathibarkala Estate, Dehradun-248 001
No.CHQ- 31 /MSA/2013
Dated 14 -8-2013
To
The Secretary to the Government of India,
Department of Science and Technology,
(Ministry of Science and Technology)
Technology Bhawan, New Mehrauli Road, New Delhi-110 016.
(Through the Surveyor General of India)
SUB: GRANT OF THE BENEFITS UNDER MACP TO UPPER DIVISION
CLERK (UDC) AND OTHER MINISTERIAL STAFF OF SURVEY OF INDIA IN THE HIERARCHY
OF THE PROMOTIONAL GRADE – REQUEST FOR.
Sir,
With due respect, I would like to submit the following few lines
on the subject for favour of your kind consideration and necessary action:-
1) That the Ministerial Staff of Survey of India are recruited
to the post of Lower Division Clerk (LDC) in the then pay scale of
Rs.950-1500. The said pay scale was revised to Rs.3050-4590 w.e.f. 1-1-1996
in terms of the Fifth CPC. The said pre-revised pay scale was revised to Pay
Band-1(Rs.5200-20200)+Grade Pay Rs.1900 w.e.f. 1-1-2006 in terms of the Sixth
CPC.
2) That as per the provisions contained in the Recruitment Rules
for the Ministerial Staff, the LDCs are eligible to be promoted to the post
of UDC on completion of 8 years regular service by DPC (1s promotion). It is
also provided in the said Rules that the LDCs can be promoted to the post of
UDCs after completion of 3 years regular service subject to passing of the
25% the Limited Departmental Competitive Examination for promotion to the
post of UDCs (1st Promotion). Accordingly, the LDCs are promoted to the post
of UDCs by DPC/LDCE in the pay scale of Rs.4000-6000.
3) That it is also provided in the said Recruitment Rules of
Ministerial Staff that UDCs in the pay scale of Rs.4000-6000 shall be
eligible for promotion to the post of Assistants by DPC (2nd promotion) in
the pay scale of pre-revised Rs.5000-8000 (previous pay scale Rs.1400- 2300)
after 5 years service as UDC.
4) That it is also provided in the Recruitment Rules of
Ministerial Staff that Assistants in the pay scale of Rs.5000-8000 shall be eligible
for promotion to the post of Office Superintendent (Rs.5500-9000) by DPC (3rd
promotion) after 3 years service as Assistant. But due to lack of appropriate
promotional ratio, the incumbents are not granted promotion within the
prescribed residency period and hence are stagnating in the same post. The
Hierarchy Chart for the Ministerial Staff in Survey of India is annexed as
Annexure-1 for your ready reference please.
5) That it is submitted that based on the recommendations of the
Fifth CPC, Government of India introduced the Assured Career Progression
Scheme (ACP Scheme) under DoP&T’s OM No.35034/3/97-Estt. (D) dated
9-8-1999. The main objective of the Scheme was to deal “with the problem
of genuine stagnation and hardships faced by the employees due to lack of
promotional avenues”. In said Scheme, it was provided for grant of two
financial upgradations in the promotional hierarchy of the cadre on
completion of 12 and 24 years of service respectively, counted from the
direct recruitment grade. The said benefits under the ACP shall be applicable
w.e.f. 9-8-1999.
6) That at the time of the introduction of the ACP Scheme, there
was an acute stagnation in the LDC, UDC and other cadres in the Ministerial
Staff. Accordingly, most of the LDCs were granted 1st ACP in the next
hierarchical grade i.e. in the pay scale of Rs.4000-6000 w.e.f.
9-8-1999 or on completion of 12 years. A number of LDCs and UDCs were
also granted 1st and 2nd ACP in the 1st and 2nd promotional grade i.e. in the
pay scale of Rs.4000-6000 and Rs.5000-8000 (Pre-revised pay scale of
Assistant) respectively w.e.f. 9-8-1999 or on completion of 24 years of
service.
7) That the Govt. of India implemented the recommendations of
the Sixth CPC under Ministry of Finance’s Notification No.F.No.1/1/2008-IC
dated 29-8-2008 effecting from 1-1-2006 and accordingly LDC. UDC, Assistant,
Office Superintendent and Establishment & Accounts Officers were placed
in the pay structure furnished as under:-
8) That the Govt. of India also issued orders regarding revised
ACP Scheme i.e. Modified ACP (MACP in short) under DoP&T’s OM
No.35034/3/2008-Estt. (D) dated 19-5-2009 for the Central Govt. Civilian
Employees replacing the existing ACP Scheme with two financial
upgradations in the hierarchy of the promotional grade on completion of
12 and 24 years of service counted from the direct entry grade to three
financial upgradations on completion of 10, 20 and 30 years counted from
the direct entry grade in the hierarchy of grade pay under MACP. As per the
aforesaid orders, the benefit under the MACP is applicable from 1-9-2008.
9) That the Surveyor General’s Office has decided to grant MACP
to the Ministerial staff keeping the pay structure of LDC as PB-1(Rs.5200-20200)+Grade
Pay Rs.1900 in view as entry grade pay structure and contended to grant the
First, Second and Third MACP in the pay structure of PB-1
(Rs.5200-20200)+Grade Pay Rs.2000, PB-1(Rs.5200-20200)+Grade Pay Rs.2400 and
PB-1(Rs.5200-20200)+Grade Pay Rs.2800 after completion of 10, 20 and 30 years
of service as LDC/UDC respectively. As such, the said decision is detrimental
to the interest of the cadre and discriminatory in nature.
10) That the following table shows how the benefits under MACP
Scheme is less advantageous because of the fact that the MACP is granted in
the hierarchy of the successive grade pay than the erstwhile ACP Scheme to
the Ministerial Staff which was granted in the promotional hierarchy. An
extract of the same is furnished hereunder :-
11)That it is found that the LDCs/UDCs who have completed 24
years service as on 31-8- 2008 (before the cut-off date of 1-9-2008), were
have been granted the benefits of 2nd ACP in the pay scale of Rs.5000-8000.
As such, these UDCs have been placed in the revised pay structure of PB-2 (Rs.9300-34800)
+ Grade Pay Rs.4200, the UDCs who have not got the 2 nd ACP prior to
31-8-2008 have been placed in PB-1(Rs.5200-20200)+Grade Pay Rs.2800 towards
2nd MACP and thus deprived of the said benefits without any justified reason.
A tables showing the discrimination meted out to the incumbents in UDCs is
furnished hereinunder :-
12)That further,UDCs have been granted 2nd Financial upgradation
under the MACP Scheme Surveyor General’s Office under No.C-
1553_/1902-MACP-Ministerial(II) dated 8.3.2011 in the pay structure of PB-1
(Rs.5200-20200)+Grade Pay of Rs.2800 instead of granting the same in the PB-2
(Rs.9300-34800) +Grade Pay Rs.4200 which the next promotional grade
(Assistant) w.e.f. 1-9-2008 or on completion of 20 years service counted from
the direct recruitment grade (Entry date).
13) That in the mean time, a point was raised in the National
Council (JCM) for grant of MACP in the hierarchy of promotional grade instead
of hierarchy of the grade pay. After thread bare discussion in the Joint
Committee of the National Council (JCM), it was decided that the
Cadre/Department may represent for grant of the MACP or ACP Scheme which
shall be beneficial to the incumbents in that cadre. The decision, in
this regard, was taken in the Second Meeting of the Joint Committee on MACP
held under the Chairmanship of Joint Secretary (E), DoP&T on 15-9-2010.
The same was circulated under GOI. DoP&T’s OM No.11/1/2010-JCA dated
6-10-2010. An extract from the decisions on item No.1 – Provide Grade Pay of
the Next Promotional Post under MACP.
As item
No.1, 3, 8, 9, 29 & 46 are similar, it was decided to club them together.
After detailed discussions on the issues, it was decided that Para 13 of MACPS shall be revised to the effect that Organizations / Cadres shall have the option to choose either the ACP Scheme or the MACP Scheme. Individual options, however, cannot be permitted.
14) That thereafter, the Third Meeting of the Joint Committee on
MACP was held on 15-3-2011 and discussed the issue in the agenda item
No.1,3,8,9 and 29 inter alia on Grant of Financial upgradation in the
promotional hierarchy instead of Grade Pay hierarchy under MACP. An excerpt
of the Minutes / decisions of the same circulated under DoP&T’s OM
No.11/1/2010-JCA dated 20-4-2011 is furnished hereunder:-
“ The
Staff side reiterated their demand that the financial upgradation under the
MACP Scheme should be granted in the promotional hierarchy of posts instead
of Grade Pay hierarchy. The Staff Side stated that the erstwhile ACP Scheme
was implemented on the recommendation of the 5th CPC and , as such, has
become a part of the service conditions of the employees. The Staff Side,
therefore, contended that the Government cannot impose the MACP Scheme
thereby altering the service conditions to the detriment of the employees.
The Official Side stated that the 6th CPC recommended two financial upgradations in the Grade Pay hierarchy. However, the Government improved upon the recommendations of the 6th CPC and has implemented MACP Scheme with three financial upgradations in the Grade Pay hierarchy after 10, 20 and 30 years. Referring to earlier discussions held in the matter, the Official Side stated that the Government was willing to consider revision in para 13 of MACP Scheme to the effect that organizations/cadres shall have the option either to choose the ACP Scheme or the MACP Scheme. However, the Staff Side pointed out that such a dispensation will not be practical and hence there is a need to explore other alternatives to solve the issue. After discussion, it was agreed that there is no need to change basic structure of MACP Scheme. However, there is need to separately examine those cases where MACP Scheme is less advantageous than the ACP Scheme. Accordingly, it was decided that the Official Side will write to the Ministry of Railways, Defence, Urban Development, Home and the Department of Posts to forward the information in respect of the specific categories of employees where the MACPS is less advantageous than the erstwhile ACP Scheme. The Official Side also requested the Staff Side to collect and forward such information to the Department of Personnel and Training for further necessary action…”
15) That then, the point was again discussed in the Joint
Committee on MACP held on 27-7- 2012. An extract of the Minutes of the said
meeting on the agenda item No.1 Grant of MACP in the promotional hierarchy,
is furnished hereunder:-
1.
Grant of MACP in the promotional hierarchy.- “…. The Staff side stated that
the employees who were in service prior to 1-1-2006 had the right to retain
first two financial upgradations in the promotional hierarchy and the
Government cannot alter the existing services conditions adversely. The
Official side, however, sated that since MACPS is in supersession of earlier
ACP Scheme, this cannot be agreed to. The Staff Side insisted that at least
option be given to individual employees in this regard to facilitate him/ her
to opt either ACP or MACP for availing benefit of financial upgradation. The
Staff Side was insistent that either MACPS should be in promotional hierarchy
or individual options should be given to the employees.
The Official Side stated that it was not possible to agree to individual options and if they have any alternate suggestions, the Staff Side could come back with them.”
16) That thereafter, the further progress in the matter is not
known.
17) That it is learnt that one employee named Raj Pal of CAT,
Chandigarh designated as Photo copier, approached the Hon’ble CAT, Chandigarh
Bench for grant of MACP in the hierachy in the anology of a similar post of
Hindi Typist and filed OA No.1038/CH/2010 in the case of Raj Pal Vs.Union of
India representaed by the Department of Personnel and Training and others.
The Hon’ble CAT, Chandigarh in the order dated 31-5-2011 allowed the
aforesaid OA and accordingly the said employee was granted MACP in the
hierarchy of the promotional post of the comparable cadre i.e. Hindi Typist.
Extracts of the aforesaid judgement of the Hon’ble CAT, Chandigarh is
furnished as under:-
“13. It
has been settled that the ACP would be granted on the completion of the
required years of service in the hierarchy of posts for the posts of LDC/Hindi
Typist, and not in the next higher scale in the recommended scales. The same
principle would have to be applicable in regard to grant of MACP to the
applicant. The only difference is that while in case of ACP two financial
upgradations were granted on completion of 12 and 24 years of service, in
case of MACP, three upgradations on the intervals of 10, 20 and 30 years of
service.
15. Be that as it may, the principle enuniciated and settled by the Tribunal / High Court for grant of ACP cnnot be changed and the same principle would apply for grant of MACP to him. The only difference is of number of years is required to be completed. We find no justification to take a different view in the matter. 16. For the foregoing reasons, the impugned order dated 9-8-2010 (Annexure A-1) qua the applicant, fixing his pay in PB-1 with grade pay of Rs.2400/- under the second MACP, and the order dated 9-8-2010 (Annexure A-2) are hereby quashed and set aside. Consequently, the respondents are directed to grant second financial upgradation to the applicant under the MACPS from due date fix his pay in the hierarchy of posts decided in his case earlier and to pay the resultant arrears without interest within a period of 2 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order….”
18) That thereafter, the Union of India represented by the
Secretary, Department of Personnel and Training and others approached the
Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CWP No.19387 of
2011 (O&M). The Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh,
in the order dated 19-10-2011, dismissed the CWP and issued orders at page 5
and 6 of the same, which reads as under:-
“… An
order adversely affecting an employee in terms of grant of financial
upgradations had already been passed which entailed civil consequences and as
such CAT has rightfully proceeded to adjudicate for the petitioners to the
effect that the earlier scheme of ACP stood superseded by MACP Scheme is
being noticed only to be rejected. The entire objective of introduction of
ACP/MACP Scheme is to alleviate stagnation as regards an employee who has a
number of regular years of service on the same post without any avenue of
promotion. It is such circumstances that a financial incentive is sought to
be granted to an employee upon completion of a certain number of years of
service on the same post. Under the ACP Scheme of 1999, the financial
upgradations were to be granted upon completion of 12 years and 24 years of
regular service whereas under the MACP Scheme such financial upgradations are
envisaged upon completion of 10, 20 or 30 years of service, the contention
raised on behalf of the petitioners if accepted would defeat the very
objective for which such Schemes have been introduced.”
“We
find no infirmity in the order dated 31-05-2011 passed by CAT in OA
No.1038/CH of 2010. The petition stands dismissed.”
19)That then the Union of India represented by the Secretary,
Department of Personnel and Training and others approached the Hon’ble
Supreme Court by way of filing SLP (SLP No.cc 7467/2013) challenging the
order dated 19-10-2011 in CWP No.19387 of 2011 of the Hon’ble High Court of
Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The Hon’ble Supreme Court has dismissed the
aforesaid SLP in the order dated 15-4-2013.
Photo copies of the aforesaid Court orders are enclosed herewith as Annexure-2 for favour of your kind perusal please.
20)That in the meant time, one Sanjay Kumar, UDC and 18 other
UDCs of the Central Government under the Ministry of Defence who are in the
pay structure of PB-1(Rs.5200- 20200)+Grade Pay Rs.2400 have approached the
Hon’ble CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No.904/2012 with the prayer for
grant of 2nd MACP in the hierachy of promotional post i.e. Assistant in the
PB-2 (Rs.9300-34800)+Grade Pay Rs.4200. The Hon’ble CAT, Principal Bench, New
Delhi, in the order dated 26-11-2012, in the aforesaid OA relied upon the
decision dated 19-10-2011 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and
Haryana at Chandigarh and in CWP No.19387 of 2011 (O&M) (Union of India
and others Vs. Raj Pal and another) and the order dated 31-5-2010 passed by
the Hon’ble CAT, Chandigarh Bench in OA No.1038/CH/2010, allowed the OA and
issued orders as under :-
“7. In
our considered view, the present OA is squaely covered by the aforesaid
judgement of Chandigarh Bench, as upheld by the Hon’ble High Court of Punjab
and Haryana at Chandigarh.
8. In fact, the respondents have wrongly interpreted the terms and conditions mentioned in the MACP Scheme, issued by the Deptt. Of Personnel and Training, in the case of the applicants. By the said Scheme, the eligible government servants are to be placed in the immediate next higher grade pay in the hierarchy of the recommended revised pay bands and grade pay and not merely in the next higher scale of pay as per the recommendations of the 6th Pay Commission. In the hierarchy, after the scale of UDC the next scale is that of Assistant. Therefore, the respondents should have given the next higher grade pay and pay band attached to the next promotional post in the hierarchy, namely,the Assistants carrying the pay scale of Rs.9300-34800 and the grade pay of Rs.4200. 9. In view of above position, the OA is allowed. The respondents are directed to grant scale of pay of Rs.9300-34800 with grade pay of Rs.4200 attached to the said promotional post of Assistant / OS from the due date to the applicant. 10. The aforesaid direction shall be complied with within the period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, subject to the other conditions mentioned in the MACP Scheme.”
A photo copy of the
aforesaid order dated 26-11-2012 issued by the Hon’ble CAT, Principal Bench,
New Delhi in OA No.904/2012 in case of Sanjay Kumar, UDC and 18 others is
enclosed herewith as Annexure-3 for your ready reference please.
21) That the UDCs and other Ministerial Staff in Survey of India
are similarly situated with the applicants of the aforesaid OAs in the matter
of grant of MACP in the hierarchy of promotional post as such the MACP in
case of UDCs and other Ministerial Staff may kindly be considered in the
light of the spirit contained in the aforesaid judicial pronouncements which
has attained its finality.
2. In view of the facts and circumstances submitted above, it is
respectfully requested that necessary orders may kindly be issued to grant of
the benefits of financial upgradations under MACP to LDC, UDC and Assistant
etc. in their respective promotional hierarchy from their due date in the
light of the decision passed by the Hon’ble CAT, Principal Bench, in the
order dated 26- 11-2012 in OA No.904/2012 in case of Sanjay Kuamr, UDC and
others Vs. Union of India and others read with the order dated 31-5-2010
passed by the Hon’ble CAT, Chandigarh Bench in OA No.1038/CH/2010 the order
dated 19-10-2011 upheld by the Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana at
Chandigarh in CWP No.19387 of 2011 (O&M) (Union of India and others Vs.
Raj Pal and another) and order dated 15-4-2013 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme
Court in SLP No.cc- 7467/2013 in this regard, in which act of your kindness,
I shall be ever grateful to you.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
( MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA )
SECRETARY GENERAL MINISTERIAL STAFF ASSOCIATION
Annexure-1
HIERARCHY CHART OF MINISTERIAL STAFF IN SURVEY OF INDIA
↑
↑
↑
↑
MINISTERIAL STAFF ASSOCIATION
SURVEY OF INDIA, CENTRAL HEADQUARTERS : DEHRADUN
C/o NPG
, Hathibarkala Estate, Dehradun-248 001
No.CHQ-
/MSA/2013
Dated 16-8-2013
To
All
Branch Secretaries.
Dear friends,
It is learnt about the contents of decision dated 26-11-2012
passed by the Hon’ble CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No.904/2012
between Sanjay Kumar, UDC and 18 others Vs. Secretary, MOD and 2 others
for grant of MACP in the hierarchy of the promotional post. On perusal of the
same, it is found that the aforesaid judgement was relied upon the decision
dated 31-5-2011 of the Hon’ble CAT, Chandigarh Bench in OA No.1038/CH/2010
in the case of Rajpal S/o Tilak Ram Vs. UOI and others issued orders for
grant of MACP in the hierarchy of the promotional post. The Hon’ble High
Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in their order dated 19-10-2011 in
CWP No.19387/ 2011 has upheld the aforesaid decision dated 31-5-2011 of the
Hon’ble CAT, Chandigarh Bench. I have received the copies of the aforesaid
CAT, Chandigarh and High Court orders along with order dated 15-4-2013 on SLP
No.cc-7467/2013 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and the gist of
these Court decisions are furhished as under:-
2. Accordingly, model draft representation addressing to the SG
which was prepared by Com. P.K. Das, Secretary, Bhubaneshwar Branch &
Dy.Secy General(CHQs) should be submitted by the UDCs preferably who are
having 10 years of service as UDC or total 20 years service as LDC and UDC
for consideration and grant of MACP in hierarchy of the promotional post i.e.
pay structure of Assistant. In case of UDC having lesser service, they may
also submit the representation with modifications. You are requested to arrange
in submitting the same to the authorities through proper channel and intimate
the same to me for information and further action.
3. In this connection you are also requested to kindly visit our
website to know the content of my letter written to DST in the matter for
your information.
4. In the mean time, we have discussed the matter with Com. S.K.
Vyas, Member National Council (JCM) and Member of the Joint Committee on MACP
and requested him to take up the issue with DoP&T / in next meeting of
Joint Committee on MACP which is likely to be held during September, 2013.
Thanking you,
Yours sincerely,
(MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA)
Secretary General.
Source : www.msasoi.com
 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Voluntary
Retirement Scheme (VRS) in CRPF, BSF, ITBP, SSB, CISF and AR : Statistics of
year wise retired CAPF personnel under VRS...
The
below information was submitted in Parliament as a written reply by the
Minister of Home Affairs on 6th August, the table of CAPF personnel proceeded
on Voluntary Retirement during each of the last three years and the current
year. And the action taken by the Central Government as remedial measures to
stop such cases and improve the service and working of CAPF.
Last
three years and current year report is given below...
(GOs-Gazetted Officer, JCO/SOs-Junior Commanding Officer/Subordinate Officers, # ORs- Other Ranks) From the above, it may be seen that the total number of personnel who have proceeded on voluntary retirement during last three years and the current year is only 35513, which is about 1.18% of the Forces posted strength per year. The personnel proceed on voluntary retirement from service mainly due to various personal and domestic reasons including children/family issues, health/illness of self or family, social/family obligations and commitments etc. The Government has taken following steps to improve the service and working conditions of the personnel: (i) Implementing a transparent, rational and fair leave policy; (ii) Grant of leave to the Force personnel to attend to their urgent domestic problems/issues/needs; (iii) Regular interaction, both formal and informal, among Commanders, officers and troops to find out and address their problems; (iv) Revamping of grievances redressaI machinery; (v) Regulating duty hours to ensure adequate rest and relief; (vi) Improving living conditions through provision of basic amenities! facilities for troops and their families; (vii) Motivating the forces through increased risk, hardship and other allowances; (viii) Provision of STD telephone facilities to the troops to facilitate being in touch th their family members and to reduce tension in the remote locations; (ix) Better medical facilities for troops and their families including introduction of Composite Hospitals with specialized facilities; (x) Organising talks by doctors and other specialists to address their personal and psychological concerns; (xi) Yoga and meditation classes for better stress management; (xii) Recreational and sports facilities and provision of team games and sports etc; (xiii) Providing welfare measures like Central Police canteen facility to the troops and their families, scholarships to their wards, etc; (xiv) Giving status of ex-CAPFs personnel to the retired personnel of CAPFs, which is expected to boost the morale of the existing CAPFs personnel and also expected to provide better identity, community recognition and thus higher esteem and pride in the society to the Ex-CAPFs personnel. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Retirement
Age 62 : Govt not considering to raise retirement age to 62
Government not
considering to raise retirement age to 62 years...
NEW DELHI : There is
raging speculation that the Centre may raise the retirement age of its staff
but top sources say there is no such move.
"There is no such
plan to raise the retirement age to 62 from 60 years," a reliable source
in the government said. There are about 50 lakh central government employees
working in various departments including the Railways across the country.
Source: PTI |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thursday, August 22, 2013
1)Granting of Grade Pay hierarchy to UDC to the next promotional post of Assistants - Ministerial Staff Association 2)Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) in CRPF, BSF, ITBP, SSB, CISF and AR 3)Retirement Age 62 : Govt not considering to raise retirement age to 62
