|
Retention
of General Pool Residential Accommodation under SR 317-B-11 and SR 317-B-22
on retirement/transfer / death of an allottee posted to a non-family station
in India
Department of Directorate of Estates has issued orders regarding
the retention of Government accommodation for the permissible
period under the provisions of SR 317-B-11 on retirement /
transfer / death of an allottee posted to a non-family station in India...
Government of India
Ministry of Urban
Development
DIRECTORATE OF ESTATES
No.12035/10/2013-Pol.II
MAY 10, 2013
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Subject : Retention of
General Pool Residential Accommodation under SR 317-B-11 and SR 317-B-22 on
retirement/transfer / death of an allottee posted to a non-family station in
India.
As per the extant
provisions, in the event of retirement / transfer / death of an allottee, the
allottee or his/her family is permitted to retain Government accommodation on
payment of normal licence fee for the period permissible under the provisions
of SR 317-B-11 and a further retention is also allowed on payment of
prescribed licence fee for the periods permissible under the provisions of SR
317-B-22 provided the accommodation is required for bonafide use of the
allottee or his/her family. However, the extended period of retention under
SR 317-B-22 is not allowed in the event of death of an allottee in cases
where the deceased allottee or his/her dependent family members own a house
at the last place of posting.
2. Further, as per OM
No.12035(26)/90-Pol.II dated 13.12.1991, in the event of death / retirement /
transfer of an allottee who has been posted/transferred to a non-family
station and permitted to retain Government accommodation occupied by him/her
at the last place of posting for bona-fide educational needs of his/her
children under SR 317-B-18, the allottee or his/her family is allowed a
further retention of accommodation for the periods permissible under the
provisions of SR 317-B-22 and the facility of retention of accommodation for
the periods permissible under the provisions of SR 317-B-11 is not allowed.
3. However, keeping in
view the hardships being faced by the allottees posted / transferred to
non-family stations in India, it has now been decided that in the event of
retirement/transfer/death of an allottee during his/her posting to a
non-family station, the allottee or his/her family shall be allowed the
facility of retention of Government accommodation at the last place of
posting tor the periods permissible under the provision of both SR 317-B 11
and SR 3I7-B 22 on payment of prescribed licence fee. However. the the
extended period of retention under SR 317-B-22 shall not be allowed in the
event of death of an allottee in cases where the deceased allotlee or his/her
dependent family members own a house at the last place of posting.
4. This OM will be
applicable from the date of issue. The cases which have been decided will not
be re-opened.
5. This supersedes all
the Office Memorandums/Orders issued from time to time prior to issue of this
OM in this regard, if any.
6. This issues with the
approval of Hon’ble Minister of Urban Development.
sd/-
(S.K. Jain)
Dy Director of
Estates(Policy)
Source :
www.estates.nic.in
Related orders...
|
||||||||||||
|
Allotment of General Pool Residential Accommodation to the
employees of State/Union Territories Governments posted in Delhi
No.12016/1/2004-Pol.II
Government of India
Minstry of Urban Development
Directorate of Estates
Nirman Bhavan,
New Delhi the 23rd MAY, 2013
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Subject : Allotment of General Pool Residential Accommodation
to the employees of State/Union Territories Governments posted in Delhi.
The allotments of residential accommodation to the employees of
State/Union Territories Governments working in Delhi are governed as per
guidelines issued vide O.M.No. 12016/2/80.Pol.II(Pt.III) dated 19.9.1997 and
letters of even number dated 24.9.2004 and dated 3.8.2009.
2. The matter has been re-examined. In order to streamline the
earlier instructions and in supersession of the OM and letters as referred
above, it has now been decided to make allotments to the employees of State
and Union Territories Governments posted in Delhi on the following basis:
1. The State/Union Territories Government employees will be
allotted accommodation only by Directorate of Estates, on the recommendation
of the concerned Resident Commissioner against the prescribed quota. The
State/Union Territories Governments will not make any allotment on their own.
2. On recommendation of the Resident Commissioner concerned, a
maximum of four higher types of residential accommodations shall be allotted
to the employees of State Government and a maximum of two higher type of
residential accommodation shall be allotted to the employees of Union
Territories on payment of normal licence fee, fixed by the Central Government
from time to time. However, more than two lower type residential
accommodations may be allotted to the employees of State Government and more
than one
residential accommodation may be allotted to the employees of
Union Territories subject to the recommendation of the Resident Commissioner
concerned within the overall ceiling of six units of residential
accommodation for State Governments and three units of residential
accommodation to Union Territories.
3. Residential accommodation to the employees of State and Union
Territories Governments shall be allotted on first floor in central area or
on any floor in non.central area.
4. Higher Type of accommodation shall be permitted on subsequent
enhancement of pay of the officer but limiting allotment upto Type 6A (C-II]
category.
5. Higher types of accommodation shall be from Type-IV(Special)
onwards. Type-IV and below types of accommodation shall henceforth be counted
as lower types.
6. Allottees will also be eligible for one change in respect of
the type of residence allotted to them. An allottee who intends to avail
change of residence, will make an application in the prescribed form which
shall be included in the change waiting list.
7. The accommodation allotted to the employees of State/Union
Territories Governments will not be earmarked for them. The officials are
required to vacate and handover the possession to the concerned CPWD Enquiry
Office. The new incumbent will have to seek fresh allotment from the
Directorate of Estates on the recommendation of the Resident Commissioner
concerned.
8. The number of units allotted to the quota of a State/UT
Government shall be restricted to six and three respectively at any given
time. New incumbent will be allotted a quarter on the recommendation of the
concerned Resident Commissioner only if quota is available.
9. The Directorate of Estates shall be responsible for
cancellation, eviction of the unauthorised occupants on receipt of
information from the concerned Resident Commissioner.
10. The new incumbent in the post of Resident Commissioner shall
be allotted Govt. accommodation of appropriate type for a period of one year
on transfer of Head of Organisation of the office of Resident Commissioner,
irrespective of the number of units allotted to the concerned State
Governments. Meanwhile.
the out going Resident Commissioner can retain the accommodation
in his occupation, if necessary, for the period admissible as per normal
rules, and will vacate the residence thereafter.
11. The allotments to the officers of State/Union Territories
Governments will continue to be made in the next below accommodation to their
entitlement with reference to their basic pay as on the crucial date in the
relevant allotment year.
12. The accommodation under occupation in excess of prescribed
quota for the concerned State/Union Territories Governments will revert back
to the General Pool, as and when vacated.
13. New incumbents will be allotted accommodation on physical
vacation of an accommodation by the outgoing incumbents on slot becoming
available under the prescribed quota as per the recommendations of the
Resident Commissioner concerned.
14. All the State/UT Governments will designate an officer as
head of the organisation and their recommendations in this regard will be
final.
15. Officers holding additional/dual charge of a post under the
State/UT Governments in Delhi will also be eligible for allotment/retention
of General Pool residential accommodation. Such allotment/retention will be
against the prescribed quota. No accommodation in excess of the quota will be
allotted/allowed to be retained under any circumstances.
16. The permission for retention of the General Pool
accommodation on medical/educational grounds to a State/UT Government
employee in case of transfer/retirement upto a maximum period prescribed for
Central Govt.employees will be given only on the recommendation of the
concerned Resident Commissioner of State/UT and the unit will be counted
towards the quota of State/UT till its vacation by the outgoing employee or
eviction by the Directorate of Estates.
3. These instructions do not apply to the officers/employees of
the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi.
4. This issues with the approval of the competent authority.
sd/-
(J.P.Rath)
Deputy Director of Estates
Source : www.estates.nic.in
 |
||||||||||||
|
Treating of upgraded posts form JAA to AA on account of
restructuring of Accounts Staff as financial upgradation of promotion
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF RAILWAY
(RAILWAY BOARD)
No.PC-V/2009/ACP/7/SCR
New Dlehi, dated 31.5.2013
The General Secretary
AIRF
4, State Entry Road,
New Delhi - 110055
Sir,
Sub :-Treating of upgraded posts form JAA to AA on account of
restructuring of Accounts Staff as financial upgradation of promotion.
The undersigned is directed to refer to AIRF’s letter
No.AIRF/05(96), dt. 11-04-2013 on the above subject and to state that the
matter has been examined in light of the provisions regarding recruitment /
promotion of Account Cadre and relevant clarifications of ACP / MACP Scheme
and it has been observed as under:
a) That the provisions regarding recruitment and promotions of
Accounts Staff are contained in Para 171 of IREM Vol.I and as per para 171
(5), the post in the grade of Account Assistant in scale of Rs. 1400-2600
will be filled by promotion of Junior Account Assistant in scale of Rs.
1200-2040 after they have completed 3 years service in the grade and passed
Appendix-II examination. This is statutory position regarding appointment to
Account Assistant’s grade which categorically stipulates that this is not
only promotion but also laid down the eligibility criterion viz. 3 years
service in JAA grade for the said promotion. Further, on appointment to AA
grade from JAA grade the employees is also allowed benefit of pay fixation
under FR 22 C as admissible in case of promotion to the post having higher
duties and responsibilities.
b) That Board’s instructions No. PC-IV/86-Imp/30, dated
18-06-1987 and E(NG) l-86/PM-9/8, dated 27-08-87 while providing for
introduction of higher functional scale of Rs.1400-2600 in Accounts Cadre to
the extent of 80% of the post of Clerk Grade-I/Rs.1200-2040 (including
existing Sub-Heads) also simultaneously laid down that Staff in Grade Rs.1200-2040
will be eligible for promotion to the higher grade after minimum 3 years
service in Rs.1200-2040 provided they have passed Appendix-IIA examination.
c) That in terms of clarifications issued against S.No.31 of
Board’s letter dated 19-02-2002 when only a part of the posts are placed in a
higher scale and rest are retained in existing grade thereby involving
re-distribution of posts, then it involves creations of another grade in the
hierarchy requiring framing of separate recruitment rules of the upgraded
posts. Placement of existing incumbents to the extent of upgradations involve
in the upgraded posts will also be treated as promotion / upgradation and
offset against entitlement under the ACP Scheme. Evidently, the case of
Accounts Staff stands covered with aforementioned instructions and therefore
their promotion/upgradation to the post of AA from JAA is to be taken into
account for the purpose of ACP Scheme and offset against entitlement under
the Scheme. From the aforementioned instructions, it is also evident that not
only promotions but upgradations as well are to be taken into account for the
purpose of ACP Scheme and the notion that only promotions has to be reckoned
for the purpose of ACP Scheme is incorrect.
d) That the ACP/MACP Schemes provides for grant of financial
upgradation to the employee subject to the fulfillment of terms and
conditions prescribed for the respective Schemes. Therefore, as per principle
of equity any upgradation granted otherwise is requires to be taken into
account for the purpose of grant of financial upgradation under the ACP/MACP
Scheme. In respect of many other categories, DoP&T- the nodal department
of Govt. on ACP/MACP Scheme have clarified that every financial upgradation is
to be counted as upgradation and offset against the financial upgradation
under the MACPS.
2. In view of the aforementioned statutory provisions and
relevant clarifications regarding ACP/MACP Scheme, the demand of the
federation is not feasible for acceptance.
Yours faithfully,
sd/-
for Secretary /
Railway Board
All India Railwaymen's Federation
4, State Entry Road, New Dlehi-110055
AIRFIO5(96)
Dated: April 11, 2013
The Executive Director Pay Commission
Railway Board,
Metro Station Building, Pragati Maidan,
New Delhi
Dear Sir,
Sub: Treatment of upgraded posts from JAA to AA on account of
restructuring of Accounts Staff as financial upgradation instead of
promotion.
Enclosed please find herewith a copy of the representation
received from Shri P.N.Chandramohan, Retd. SSO(A), on the above noted
subject.
From the representation it has been observed that restructuring
of Accounts Staff was done in 1987 in terms of Boards letter dated
18.06.1987. The ratio of number of posts in higher and lower scale was
decided as under:
To the extent of 80%
posts of SO(A)/T1A/ISA have been upgraded to Rs.2000-3200, and the same has
not been treated as promotion and offset against financial upgradation
applicable under ACP Scheme. Whereas, upgradation of Clerk Grade I cadre
restructuring done at the same time(01.04.1987) from JAA to AA is being
treated as promotion and reckoned for the purpose of financial upgradation
under MACPS.
Boards attention is also
drawn towards the information furnished under RTI by the Railway Board
against Item No.31 (photocopy enclosed for ready reference), wherein
placement of posts in a higher scale has not been treated as
promotion/upgradation.
In view of the above,
AIRF feels that this matter needs to be examined in length in the interest of
Accounts Staff who have been deprived of 3rd financial upgradation under
MACPS due to treatment of upgradation of posts as promotion.
An early action in the
matter is solicited.
|
Tuesday, June 4, 2013
FLASH NEWS
