MUMBAI: Three decades after their battle began, and despite a victory in the Supreme Courtin September, several thousand retired central government employees are yet to get their pension restored.
Unwilling to let the octogenarians celebrate, the Centre filed a review
petition in the top court last month and decided to implement the
restoration subject to its outcome. The Union ministry of personnel,
public grievances and pensions issued an office memorandum on December
21to give former central government employees who had litigated for
years, including K Ganesan, a spearheading litigant who died during the process, this bittersweet news.
The issue centres around a pension rule that permitted central government employees to shift en masse from the 1960s to the 1980s to public sector undertakings (PSUs) that needed experienced workers at the time. To aid and promote the move, the Centre allowed the employees to avail of 100% lump sum pension in advance for 15 years. The rules had till then permitted a partial onethird commutation. Acomplicated formula is at work for pension calculations.Essentially, such employees who had claimed a lump sum upfront in a particular year, went on to fight for restoration of pension (effectively arrears) as per service years, after accounting for the lump sum payment made earlier. The issue was a fight against effective downgrade of pension slabs.
While the Political execu... Read More
Several legal battles ensued, beginning in 1983. In 1987, the SC first
allowed one-third restoration for Central govern ment employees after a
15-year period, and a decade later extended the benefit to those who had
shifted to PSUs.
The issue centres around a pension rule that permitted central government employees to shift en masse from the 1960s to the 1980s to public sector undertakings (PSUs) that needed experienced workers at the time. To aid and promote the move, the Centre allowed the employees to avail of 100% lump sum pension in advance for 15 years. The rules had till then permitted a partial onethird commutation. Acomplicated formula is at work for pension calculations.Essentially, such employees who had claimed a lump sum upfront in a particular year, went on to fight for restoration of pension (effectively arrears) as per service years, after accounting for the lump sum payment made earlier. The issue was a fight against effective downgrade of pension slabs.
Latest Comment
The judgement of the Chennai high court was upheld by the Hon''ble Supreme court as the government side could not tell in 6 years as to what was wrong in the judgement.While the Political execu... Read More
K Ganesan, who was with the finance ministry and in 1986 moved to BHEL, a PSU, after availing of lump sum pension in advance, launched a fight in the Madras high court.In 2007, the court upheld the plea. It significantly held that the Centre cannot wipe away the rights of an employee for restoration. It said an employee remains a pensioner under the Pensions Act, 1871. Navi Mumbai resident Satish Kate, part of another association and who worked with the Indian Bureau of Mines and retired in 2006 from Indian Oil Corporation, is among those awaiting restoration."Many of the 7,000-odd pensioners are aged over 80. They may not live to enjoy pension in their lifetime if the legal battle continues," he said. "The SC order applies to all of us who were absorbed by PSUs.The PM heads the ministry of personnel, public grievances and pension."
